plemented in an open source project. The only proposed changed
(see above) is the privacy and tracking discussion. Nobody has
submitted a more general draft. It seems odd to have to wait for a
session in Berlin when there isn't any concrete proposal being
discussed on the mai
doesn't seem to be much room for argument there.
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
At 10:55 12-06-2013, Fernando Gont wrote:
This latest revision addresses the feedback sent by Alissa Cooper.
Should we progress this document now?
Yes. The proposal will be implemented.
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working
s done. I am
ok with what you prefer in terms of document organization.
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
losures, if any, to be filed before it is moved forward?
Could someone provide a summary of the issues for
draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-08?
Thanks,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
track' and
informational, and IETF drafts floating around." [1][2]
Regards,
-sm
1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg79157.html
2. http://ripe58.ripe.net/content/presentations/ietf-update.pdf
I
Hi Fernando,
I owe you an apology as one of the comments I made on this thread may
be misinterpreted. You responded to all the comments I read.
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative
/msg16859.html If
there are any issues about privacy you could raise them on the
ietf-priv...@ietf.org mailing list.
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org
tead of "most" if there
are ever any privacy issues.
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
e two sections above.
Agreed.
Regards,
-sm
P.S. I hope that the 6MAN WG does not ignore Alissa's comment.
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
At 16:33 27-03-2013, Bob Hinden wrote:
The minutes for the 6MAN session at IETF86 in Orlando can be found at:
There was a presentation of draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-02. Will 6MAN be
working on that draft?
Regards,
-sm
IETF
from that is a best guess [1]. A RIR can be asked
to "clarify that Puerto Rico is part of the United States" [2].
Regards,
-sm
1.
http://meetings.apnic.net/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/23486/Lepinski-APNIC-30-Geolocation-Registry.pdf
2. https://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/suggesti
At 02:11 12-11-2012, Robin Wilton wrote:
- The people who would have to do the work to implement and deploy
the enhancement are not the ones who would get the direct benefit -
which makes it hard to build a rationale for doing it.
http://www.cleanitproject.eu/
Regards,
-sm
ge.
Maps, navigation, emergency calls and many other services will also
get enhanced with accurate locations.
The above are arguments in favor of such a functionality. What are
the disadvantages?
Regards,
-sm
IETF IP
?
See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg13685.html
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
6547 moves RFC 3627 to Historic. I don't see any reason to
reopen it with a -bis. Please see
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/rfc-metadata-errata.html
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@iet
Hi Simon,
At 05:35 13-07-2012, Simon Perreault wrote:
Have you heard of Postel's law?
I try to be liberal in accepting arguments arguments from by
implementers. I am conservative when it comes to usage of RFC 2119 key words.
Regards
, there is
interoperability. Telling people what not to use sounds appropriate
if there is a good reason to do so. The requirements seem redundant to me.
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
gh.
I suggest discussing about the paperwork on the DNSEXT mailing list.
Regards,
-sm
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
19 matches
Mail list logo
