In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:52:34 +0200), Francis Dupont
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>In linux it works fine though, I only nead one socket. I have not
> tested any other O.S. yet. This seams highly contraditory...
>
> => Linux is not conform too but the issue is m
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:34:58 +0200), Stig Venaas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > the behavior (relationship between AF_INET and AF_INET6 sockets/binds)
> > is not documented, so there's no standard. sigh.
>
> I second that. I would hope that also Linux allo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 01 Mar 2004 17:27:22 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI
(BHideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
(B
(B> 2. The description for "ifa_flags" is rather bogus.
(B>For L3 addresses, it seems to return IFA_xxx (or IN6_IFA_xxx?) flags,
(B>instead
Hello.
(B
(BIn article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:54:25 +0900), JINMEI Tatuya /
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H(B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
(B
(B> FYI: currently getifaddrs(3) provides the following information:
(B>
(B> char *ifa_name; /* Interface n
