> No. EUI-64 requires 64 bit host id's. 48 bits is from the MAC. How
> would you plan to squeeze blood out of the proverbial turnip?
perhaps going back and reading thomas's message would help dispel this
odd religion.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg13461.html
randy
--
In message , "Manfredi, Albert E" writes:
> I guess I'm missing what the solution is.
>
> As 3177-bis says, the IETF has no control over how service providers hand out
> IPv6 address space. From what I've been reading in the past few years, it lo
> oks like at least some providers are planning to
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 16:59, Manfredi, Albert E <
albert.e.manfr...@boeing.com> wrote:
> I guess I'm missing what the solution is.
>
The solution is for providers to not give out just /64s :).
>
> As 3177-bis says, the IETF has no control over how service providers hand
> out IPv6 address space
To: Mark Smith
>> Cc: Thomas Narten; ipv6; Scott W Brim; Duncan,Richard J. (Jeremy)
>> CONTRACTOR; Yu Hua bing
>> Subject: Re: [BULK] Re: draft-yhb-6man-slaac-improvement-00
>>
>> Yes, and in fact draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites deals
>> with this and will be an RFC
, 2011 1:59 PM
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: ipv6
Subject: RE: [BULK] Re: draft-yhb-6man-slaac-improvement-00
I guess I'm missing what the solution is.
As 3177-bis says, the IETF has no control over how service providers hand
out IPv6 address space. From what I've been reading in the past few
03, 2011 4:41 PM
> To: Mark Smith
> Cc: Thomas Narten; ipv6; Scott W Brim; Duncan,Richard J. (Jeremy)
> CONTRACTOR; Yu Hua bing
> Subject: Re: [BULK] Re: draft-yhb-6man-slaac-improvement-00
>
> Yes, and in fact draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites deals
> with this and will be an
| 128 - N bits |
>> +---++
>> |link prefix | random number |
>> ++
>>
---+
>
>
>
>
> From: Duncan, Richard J. (Jeremy) CONTRACTOR
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:56 PM
> To: Yu Hua bing ; trej...@gmail.com ; Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: Thomas Narten ; ipv6 ; Scott W Brim
> Subject: RE: [BULK] Re: draft-yhb-6man
PM
To: Yu Hua bing ; trej...@gmail.com ; Brian E Carpenter
Cc: Thomas Narten ; ipv6 ; Scott W Brim
Subject: RE: [BULK] Re: draft-yhb-6man-slaac-improvement-00
I think that SLAAC should be deployed in the sites which use the prefixes
longer than 64.
Don't put a limit on the prefix length.
(540) 440-1193
_
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yu
Hua bing
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:50 AM
To: trej...@gmail.com; Brian E Carpenter
Cc: Thomas Narten; ipv6; Scott W Brim
Subject: [BULK] Re: draft-yhb-6man-slaac-improvement-00
Importance:
10 matches
Mail list logo
