Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt]

2011-06-30 Thread Brian E Carpenter
-- >> From: "Jari Arkko" >> To: "Brian E Carpenter" >> Cc: "6man" >> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 12:35 AM >> Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt] >> >> >>> I looked at Last Call t

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt]

2011-06-30 Thread Bob Hinden
> Tom Petch > > - Original Message - > From: "Jari Arkko" > To: "Brian E Carpenter" > Cc: "6man" > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 12:35 AM > Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt] > > >> I looked at Las

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt]

2011-06-30 Thread t.petch
Is there a document shepherd write up for this document? Is there a document shepherd:-) Tom Petch - Original Message - From: "Jari Arkko" To: "Brian E Carpenter" Cc: "6man" Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 12:35 AM Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt]

2011-06-30 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Thanks Jari. Of course, we can always factor in later WG comments if necessary. Regards Brian On 2011-06-30 10:35, Jari Arkko wrote: > I looked at Last Call time period and IESG telechat schedule and saw > that if we want this approved before the IETF, it needs to go to IETF > Last Call today.

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt]

2011-06-29 Thread Bob Hinden
On Jun 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > I looked at Last Call time period and IESG telechat schedule and saw that if > we want this approved before the IETF, it needs to go to IETF Last Call > today. So I sent it in. If there are substantive comments from the working > group we can pu

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt]

2011-06-29 Thread Jari Arkko
I looked at Last Call time period and IESG telechat schedule and saw that if we want this approved before the IETF, it needs to go to IETF Last Call today. So I sent it in. If there are substantive comments from the working group we can pull the document back for further consideration in the wo

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt]

2011-06-29 Thread Jari Arkko
Good. Are we ready to send this to Last Call, or do we want to wait for possible other comments from the working group? Jari Brian E Carpenter kirjoitti: I believe this version resolves Jari's comments and the subsequent discussion. Brian Original Message Subject: I-D A

[Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt]

2011-06-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I believe this version resolves Jari's comments and the subsequent discussion. Brian Original Message Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:11:29 -0700 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org CC: ipv6@ietf.org A