RE: [Fwd: Re: humid IPv6 addresses]

2006-10-10 Thread Pars Mutaf
when there is a collision. This is practical > when the use case is local ad-hoc. The logic for having part of the address > be typed in as hex and part as a string is just broken, so all references to > remote use need to go. > > Tony > > > -----Original Message- >

RE: [Fwd: Re: humid IPv6 addresses]

2006-10-09 Thread Tony Hain
having part of the address be typed in as hex and part as a string is just broken, so all references to remote use need to go. Tony > -Original Message- > From: Pars Mutaf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:13 AM > To: ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: [Fwd:

[Fwd: Re: humid IPv6 addresses]

2006-09-29 Thread Pars Mutaf
Dear IPv6, FYI, I have received the following comments on the human-regenerable IPv6 interface IDs and addresses (from the DNSEXT WG). I've also been told that humid addresses may be helpful when L2 multicast isn't supported, in Wimax for example (other mechanisms e.g. IPv6 Node Information