TED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "IETF IPv6 Mailing List"
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Int-area] RE: [netlmm] Multilink Subnet Considerations for
NETLMMAddressing
jak>> What are your expectations about what advertising 'L=1' means
for
James,
> I'm not going to discuss this text with you any further on the list at
this
> time. I believe the text is sufficiently unclear and imprecise to
result in
> confusion about how one should implement the MN-AR interface in
NETLMM.
> Clearly, you disagree and you're not prepared to accommo
> jak>> What are your expectations about what advertising 'L=1' means
for the
> link?
The criteria that allow a prefix to be advertised with 'L=1' are
covered under the final paragraph of the offered text, and what
advertising 'L=1' means for the link is covered under RFC2461.
> The point of th
Fred,
jak>> The last paragraph of Section 2.1 in 4291 says:
Currently, IPv6 continues the IPv4 model in that a subnet prefix is
associated with one link. Multiple subnet prefixes may be assigned
to the same link.
jak>> So whether the term "associated" or "assigned" is used is not
par
