See my previous response.
Sent from my iPad
On 2013-05-23, at 1:27 AM, Brian E Carpenter
wrote:
> Again, completely wrong for the same reason that Erratum 3630 is wrong.
>
> Regards
> Brian Carpenter
>
> On 23/05/2013 15:59, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> The following errata report has been
Again, completely wrong for the same reason that Erratum 3630 is wrong.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 23/05/2013 15:59, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6874,
> "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource
> Identifi
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6874,
"Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource
Identifiers".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6874&eid=3631