Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6874 (3631)

2013-05-22 Thread Michael Sweet
See my previous response. Sent from my iPad On 2013-05-23, at 1:27 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Again, completely wrong for the same reason that Erratum 3630 is wrong. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 23/05/2013 15:59, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6874 (3631)

2013-05-22 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Again, completely wrong for the same reason that Erratum 3630 is wrong. Regards Brian Carpenter On 23/05/2013 15:59, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6874, > "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource > Identifi

[Technical Errata Reported] RFC6874 (3631)

2013-05-22 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6874, "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource Identifiers". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6874&eid=3631