Re: [dhcwg] Re: Original intent of M/O bits

2005-05-24 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:39:41 -0400, > Ralph Droms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Regarding breaking backward compatibility - this compatibility affects > only clients, right? Can we answer the question: exactly how would > existing clients (and I'll bet we can enumerate all the available

Re: [dhcwg] Re: Original intent of M/O bits

2005-05-24 Thread Ralph Droms
Regarding breaking backward compatibility - this compatibility affects only clients, right? Can we answer the question: exactly how would existing clients (and I'll bet we can enumerate all the available clients) be affected by a change in definition? How would the observed behavior of the client