some education on ULA routing - starting new thread...
- Anders
From: homenet-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:homenet-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ray Hunter
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:29
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: 6man; Tim Chown; Don Sturek; home...@ietf.org Group
Subject: Re: [homenet] ULA sco
+1
Firstly, I have been lurking on the 3484-revise discussion in 6man for a
long time. I agree with Brian's proposal:
[source & destination of a /48 ULA prefix match => prefer over 2000:/3
space. Otherwise don't (by default).]
Secondly, I think Homenet still has a lot of work to do, especia
Don,
On 2012-03-22 01:24, Don Sturek wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> One more consideration:
> In the home, it is possible that multiple independent subnets could be
> combined, each with their own ULA prefix. This would happen in cases
> where the homeowner buys multiple silo'ed solutions (like a home
> a
Tim Chown wrote:
>Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:55
> On 20 Mar 2012, at 21:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> > On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote:
> >>
> >> It is a surprise to me that ULA addresses are not by default routable
> within the site.
> >> I can easily imagine a number of LLN bord
Brian Carpenter writes:
> On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote:
> > Kerry Lynn writes:
> >
> >> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler
> >> wrote:
> >>> Brian Carpenter writes:
> >>> [...]
> >
> > It is a surprise to me that ULA addresses are not by default routable within
> the site.
>
Hi Tim,
One more consideration:
In the home, it is possible that multiple independent subnets could be
combined, each with their own ULA prefix. This would happen in cases
where the homeowner buys multiple silo'ed solutions (like a home
automation system, Wi-Fi AP with connected MACs/Pcs, etc) th
On 20 Mar 2012, at 21:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote:
>>
>> It is a surprise to me that ULA addresses are not by default routable within
>> the site.
>> I can easily imagine a number of LLN border routers which autonomously
>> allocate
>> different ULA
On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote:
> Kerry Lynn writes:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler
>> wrote:
>>> Brian Carpenter writes:
>>> [...]
Let me be clear. If a local service has (for some reason) both a ULA
and a non- ULA global address, and the host has both, I t
Kerry Lynn writes:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler
> wrote:
> > Brian Carpenter writes:
> > [...]
> >> Let me be clear. If a local service has (for some reason) both a ULA
> >> and a non- ULA global address, and the host has both, I think the
> >> correct default behaviour is for t
