Re: [rfc2462bis issue 277] M/O flags and DHCPv6

2004-03-04 Thread Ralph Droms
Comments in line... At 09:31 PM 2/27/2004 +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= wrote: [...] *** regarding question c I'd first like to answer this question. RFC2462 currently says: Stateful autoconfiguration for IPv6 is the subject of future work [DHCPv6]. (S

RE: [rfc2462bis issue 277] M/O flags and DHCPv6

2004-02-29 Thread john . loughney
Jinmei, Here are my 2 cents; I'll send comments on the points I have comments, otherwise note any non-comment as a non-objection. > Since this message is lengthy, I'll first summarize the major > (proposed) changes as follows: > > - clarify that the stateful protocol *is*

[rfc2462bis issue 277] M/O flags and DHCPv6

2004-02-27 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
(note: this is a long message.) One major open issue of rfc2462bis is semantics of the M/O bit, what "stateful configuration" means, etc. Ralph Droms raised a set of questions in March 2003: a. the text needs to be updated to use RFC 2119 keywords b. which keywords? c. what is "the stateful conf