On 14/06/2011 00:09, Stephen Farrell wrote:
* RFC 6105 โ "IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard"
* RFC 6106 โ "IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS
Configuration", ยง7 in particular.
maybe mention draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-evasion? It's not a strategic
focused document, but giv
On 15 Jun 2011, at 01:42, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>
>> RFC5157 IPv6 Implications for Network Scanning
>
> Personally, I think that RFC has been overtaken by events. Network scans have
> been reported in the wild.
I just re-read the abstract a
Thanks Nick,
I'll add that unless someone tells me its a bad plan.
Its a fairly fresh I-D, but I guess it looks pretty
relevant all right.
S.
On 14/06/11 11:00, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 14/06/2011 00:09, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> * RFC 6105 โ "IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard"
>> * RF
On 14 Jun 2011, at 05:51, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Russ,
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>
>> Stephen:
>>
>> Comments below.
>>
>> Russ
>>
>>
>>> From: IETF Security Area
>>> To: Study Group 17, Questions 2 and 3
>>> Title: Work on Security of IPv6
>>>
>>> FOR ACTION
>>>
Russ,
On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Stephen:
>
> Comments below.
>
> Russ
>
>
>> From: IETF Security Area
>> To: Study Group 17, Questions 2 and 3
>> Title: Work on Security of IPv6
>>
>> FOR ACTION
>>
>> The IETF thanks Study Group 17 for its liaison LS-206 "Liaison o