Re: [v6ops] [saag] ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison

2011-06-16 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 14/06/2011 00:09, Stephen Farrell wrote: * RFC 6105 โ€“ "IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard" * RFC 6106 โ€“ "IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS Configuration", ยง7 in particular. maybe mention draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-evasion? It's not a strategic focused document, but giv

Re: [v6ops] [saag] ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison

2011-06-15 Thread Tim Chown
On 15 Jun 2011, at 01:42, Fred Baker wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > >> RFC5157 IPv6 Implications for Network Scanning > > Personally, I think that RFC has been overtaken by events. Network scans have > been reported in the wild. I just re-read the abstract a

Re: [v6ops] [saag] ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison

2011-06-14 Thread Stephen Farrell
Thanks Nick, I'll add that unless someone tells me its a bad plan. Its a fairly fresh I-D, but I guess it looks pretty relevant all right. S. On 14/06/11 11:00, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 14/06/2011 00:09, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> * RFC 6105 โ€“ "IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard" >> * RF

Re: [v6ops] [saag] ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison

2011-06-14 Thread Stephen Farrell
On 14 Jun 2011, at 05:51, Bob Hinden wrote: > Russ, > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Russ Housley wrote: > >> Stephen: >> >> Comments below. >> >> Russ >> >> >>> From: IETF Security Area >>> To: Study Group 17, Questions 2 and 3 >>> Title: Work on Security of IPv6 >>> >>> FOR ACTION >>>

Re: [v6ops] [saag] ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison

2011-06-13 Thread Bob Hinden
Russ, On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Russ Housley wrote: > Stephen: > > Comments below. > > Russ > > >> From: IETF Security Area >> To: Study Group 17, Questions 2 and 3 >> Title: Work on Security of IPv6 >> >> FOR ACTION >> >> The IETF thanks Study Group 17 for its liaison LS-206 "Liaison o