ft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopb...@tools.ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopback
>
>>Since NS(DAD) traverse the same link, couldn't we just use src MAC of
> the received NS(DAD) to identify if the NS is the one sent by the
> interface earlier?
Hi,
2011/10/20 Gert Doering :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:47:28PM +0800, Washam Fan wrote:
>> Sorry for late response.
>>
>> Since NS(DAD) traverse the same link, couldn't we just use src MAC of
>> the received NS(DAD) to identify if the NS is the one sent by the
>> interface earlier?
>>
v6ops-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Lorenzo Colitti
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 6:15 AM
> To: Erik Kline
> Cc: v6...@ietf.org; draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopb...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopback
&
-
From: George, Wes [mailto:wesley.geo...@twcable.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 10:19 AM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant); Washam Fan
Cc: v6...@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [v6ops] new draft: draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopback
> a completed
> algorithm to detect looped back NS(DAD) me
> a completed
> algorithm to detect looped back NS(DAD) messages in
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hsingh-6man-enhanced-dad-01
>
[WEG]] It is also worth noting that the authors of draft-asati are working to
incorporate some elements of that draft into the one that Hemant mentions
above, and
: draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopback
>Since NS(DAD) traverse the same link, couldn't we just use src MAC of
the received NS(DAD) to identify if the NS is the one sent by the
interface earlier?
No. Two nodes could almost simultaneously issue a NS(DAD) and both the
nodes have the same mac-address
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:47:28PM +0800, Washam Fan wrote:
> Sorry for late response.
>
> Since NS(DAD) traverse the same link, couldn't we just use src MAC of
> the received NS(DAD) to identify if the NS is the one sent by the
> interface earlier?
>
> Am I missing something?
Yes. Not all
nt: Monday, August 29, 2011 6:15 AM
> To: Erik Kline
> Cc: v6...@ietf.org; draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopb...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopback
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 18:54, Erik Kline wrote:
>
> +1 to section 3.2, gene
1 6:15 AM
> To: Erik Kline
> Cc: v6...@ietf.org; draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopb...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopback
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 18:54, Erik Kline wrote:
> +1 to section 3.2, generally.
>
> This is definitely a
-loopb...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-asati-v6ops-dad-loopback
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 18:54, Erik Kline wrote:
+1 to section 3.2, generally.
This is definitely a useful problem to solve. I have personally had to
work around this situation more than once, sometimes by
10 matches
Mail list logo
