Here is the suggested text. The current version of this
section is at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt
I believe Dave's comment only applies to point 1) in the
current draft. So I only changed that point. The rest doesn't
seem to contradict 4311.
Comments?
H
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:20 AM
> To: Dave Thaler; Soliman, Hesham; Bob Hinden
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
>
> It seems to me that it would be easier to obsolete RFC 4311 rather
than
> trying to keep it and 2461
Hesham, Dave,
A draft standard can't have a normative reference to a proposed
standard.
I believe the options are:
a) remove the problematic text from 2461bis and don't replace it with
anything (i.e., be silent on the issue). I'm not sure what the state
of 4311 changes to then, since it's upda
be
the simplest solution in the long run?
Bert
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Thaler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:04 PM
> To: Soliman, Hesham; Bob Hinden
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
>
>
Yes I was suggesting (b) above.
Hesham
>
> -Dave
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:22 AM
> > To: Bob Hinden
> > Cc: Dave Thaler; ipv6@ietf.org
> > Subject:
ob Hinden
> Cc: Dave Thaler; ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> > > Dave,
> > >
> > > I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone
> > > oppose Dave's suggestion
> > > below to
Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Dave Thaler
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:37 PM
> To: JINMEI Tatuya /
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
>
> draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.tx
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Dave Thaler
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:37 PM
To: JINMEI Tatuya /
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt says in 6.3.6:
An implement
Title: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
Dave,
I
think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone oppose Dave's
suggestion
below
to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ?
Thx,
Hesham
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Title: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt says in 6.3.6:
An implementation may choose to always return the same router or
cycle through the router list in a round-robin fashion as long
as it always returns a reachable or a probably reachable router
10 matches
Mail list logo
