Hi Suresh,
Thanks for the quick turnaround!
When the new draft comes out, I will send it to IETF LC. After we
make it through IETF LC, the document will be reviewed by the full
IESG. So, at this point, there are no further changes that need to
be made, but you may need to make changes base
Hi Margaret,
Thanks for the comments and the text. I have submitted version -04 of
the draft with the suggested changes. Let me know if you have any more
issues you would like me to address.
Cheers
Suresh
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
At 10:15 AM -0400 5/11/05, Suresh Kri
At 10:15 AM -0400 5/11/05, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.1 Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2 Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Why is the RFC 2119 section
Hi Margaret,
Thanks for the comments. Please see my replies inline.
Thanks
Suresh
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
I think that sometihng went wrong with the structure of this document:
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.
Hi All,
I have a few AD Review comments on
draft-ietf-ipv6-privacy-addrs-v2-03 that I would like to have
resolved before I send this document to IETF LC. I've included those
comments below.
Brian and Bob, the tracker indicates that this document is intended
for publication as a
