Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis

2010-06-09 Thread Jari Arkko
-options-bis-03_txt.htm From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 2:12 PM To: draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-...@tools.ietf.org; IETF IPv6 Mailing List Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis I have re

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis

2010-06-09 Thread Jaehoon Paul Jeong
12 PM >To: draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-...@tools.ietf.org; IETF IPv6 Mailing List >Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis > >I have re-reviewed this document now that Bob passed it on to me for >submission to IESG and IETF level reviews. > >I found three remaining is

AD review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis

2010-06-09 Thread Jari Arkko
I have re-reviewed this document now that Bob passed it on to me for submission to IESG and IETF level reviews. I found three remaining issues: 1) RFC 1035 should be moved to be a normative reference. 2) The encoding of DNS search lists is underspecified: Domain Names of DNS Search List