s Kempf; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462
>
>
> Jim,
>
> > If we had to recycle 2460 and Steve is still gone and Bob
> Hinden don't
> > have time (which I guess is the case with Erik and Thomas) would we
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 02:00:22 -0500,
> "Bound, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> As we recycle 2461 and 2462 specifications I suggest that no additional
> names be added to the authors names for two reasons. First its not
> "honorable" as nothing has been discussed nor I perceive currently
> > If we had to recycle 2460 and Steve is still gone and Bob Hinden
don't
> > have time (which I guess is the case with Erik and Thomas) would we
add
> > another name to the IPv6 specification? I don't believe we would
out of
> > respect to Steve.
>
> And who on earth would be willing to author
Jim,
> If we had to recycle 2460 and Steve is still gone and Bob Hinden don't
> have time (which I guess is the case with Erik and Thomas) would we add
> another name to the IPv6 specification? I don't believe we would out of
> respect to Steve.
And who on earth would be willing to author a docu
> As we recycle 2461 and 2462 specifications I suggest that no additional
> names be added to the authors names for two reasons.
I don't think such a rigid rule is appropriate. Authors/editors should
be properly acknowledged for their work. If a new author/editor takes
over an existing RFC, they s
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:37:15AM -0500, Bound, Jim wrote:
>
> If we had to recycle 2460 and Steve is still gone and Bob Hinden don't
> have time (which I guess is the case with Erik and Thomas) would we add
> another name to the IPv6 specification? I don't believe we would out of
> respect to S
on" which is not the case here at all.
/jim
> -Original Message-
> From: James Kempf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:02 PM
> To: Bound, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462
>
&
James Kempf wrote:
Jim,
Are there any precedents? What has IETF done in other cases where specs have
been rev-ed?
The only case I personally know of is Mobile IPv4, in which the
author/editor name was not changed when a new revision was put out, but
perhaps there are others where different procedu
.
jak
- Original Message -
From: "Bound, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 11:00 PM
Subject: Authors Section on recyle clarifications to 2461and 2462
> As we recycle 2461 and 2462 specifications I s
As we recycle 2461 and 2462 specifications I suggest that no additional
names be added to the authors names for two reasons. First its not
"honorable" as nothing has been discussed nor I perceive currently will
be learned that adds any architectural value of "significance" to these
widely deployed
10 matches
Mail list logo
