> Quoting from S5.2:
>
>Next-hop determination for a given unicast destination operates as
>follows. The sender performs a longest prefix match against the
>Prefix List to determine whether the packet's destination
> is on- or
>off-link. If the destination is on-link, th
Title: RFC2461bis: Multicast capable vs Multicast Service [was RE: Comments for rc2461bis]
Your
mail server forgot ;)
Using the term 'multicast services' around this area is
confusing. If the link MUST provide multicast services maybe that is
something that should be in
Title: Comments for rc2461bis
Elwyn,
Thanks
for your detailed review.
Sorry
for the late response, comments inline. I addressed all editorials.
BTW,
I'd appreciate it if you could respond in text format.
Substantive comments: S2.2 and S3: The note after the NBMA
definition
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:04:35 +0900,
> "S. Daniel Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've catched one minor missing of 2461bis when responding M/O flags.
> [snip]
> O 1-bit "Other stateful configuration" flag. When
> set, it indicates that [DHCPv6-lite] is
I've catched one minor missing of 2461bis when responding M/O flags.
[snip]
O 1-bit "Other stateful configuration" flag. When
set, it indicates that [DHCPv6-lite] is available
for autoconfiguration of other (non-address)
information
Title: Comments for rc2461bis
Thanks
for your comments. I'll prepare new issues/responses
as
needed and get back to each one separately.
Hesham
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Elwyn DaviesSent:
Wednesday, August 04, 2004
Title: Comments for rc2461bis
I just went through 2461bis having not looked in detail for a while.
The intention was to check consistency and comprehensibility for those not so close to the subject.
Editorial nits:
S2.1: Last item (random delay seed) - missing newline so title of definition