Hi Lorenzo,
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:25:53 -0700
Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Mark Smith <
> i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org> wrote:
>
> > I'm happy with using /64s for PPPoE links. However, if the /127 draft is
> > accepted, then I'd want to be able
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Mark Smith <
i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org> wrote:
> I'm happy with using /64s for PPPoE links. However, if the /127 draft is
> accepted, then I'd want to be able to take advantage of them on
> PPP/PPPoE sessions - if there is an approved mechan
On Behalf Of Mark
> Smith
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:47 PM
> To: Mark Smith
> Cc: Becca Nitzan; s...@core3.amsl.com; ipv6@ietf.org; George, Wes E [NTK];
> ra...@psg.com; Miyakawa; lore...@google.com
> Subject: DHCPv6 support for /127s, for ISP subscriber PPP/PPPoE p2p links
:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Smith
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:47 PM
To: Mark Smith
Cc: Becca Nitzan; s...@core3.amsl.com; ipv6@ietf.org; George, Wes E [NTK];
ra...@psg.com; Miyakawa; lore...@google.com
Subject: DHCPv6 support for /127s, for ISP subscriber PPP/PPPoE p2p links
(Re: r
Hi,
The subject pretty much says it. It's extremely wasteful to be
allocating a /64 per subscriber PPP/PPPoE session.
An alternative model is lay a "virtual" /64 over the top of the 100s or
1000s of PPP/PPPoE sessions, and have the subscriber's PPP IID used to
autoconf the LL and global addresse
