> -Original Message-
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Second, a number
> of implementations already have turned the feature off, which
> obviously means that we cannot expect a random node in the
> Internet to always respect anyone's request to perform a RH0
> operation.
Th
> So are you _really_ sure you want to drop RH0 from the IPv6 protocol
> spec, given that the practicalities of a general use 'replacement'
> header is going to present some fascinating transition issues?
I suspect code changes are necessary in any case, completely
independent of whether RH0 or R
