Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-6man-hbh-header-update-00.txt

: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-6man-hbh-header-update-00.txt Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I agree with Joel H's note here: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg15503.html> I also agree with Brian C's no

Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-6man-hbh-header-update-00.txt

I agree with Joel H's note here: I also agree with Brian C's note here: I think it important that we do not make changes that effectively close the

Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-6man-hbh-header-update-00.txt

It seems likely to me that an efficient host implementation can meet the existing requirement relative to sourcing a packet with such options without noticeable load. So there does not seem any point in relaxing the requirement. And technically, if the host puts ina strict source route, and the

FW: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-6man-hbh-header-update-00.txt

For your comment. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tsou-6man-hbh-header-update/ > -Original Message- > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 8:45 PM > To: Tina TSOU > Cc: Sreenatha setty b > Subject: New Version Notification f