Re: IPv6 smurf amplifiers (draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-01.txt)

Hi, Simon, On 01/15/2013 07:12 AM, Simon Perreault wrote: > Le 2013-01-14 20:13, Fernando Gont a écrit : >> No. The following text in Section 4.2 of RFC 2460 overrides what's in >> RFC 4443: > > An earlier RFC can't "override" a later RFC. The later RFC wins. I agree that my phrasing was sloppy

Re: IPv6 smurf amplifiers (draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-01.txt)

Hi, Ole, On 01/14/2013 04:13 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: > > On 01/14/2013 05:10 AM, Ole Troan wrote: >>> We have published a revision of our I-D entitled "Security Implications >>> of IPv6 options of Type 10xx", about IPv6 smurf amplifiers. >>> >>> The I-D is available at: >>>

Re: IPv6 smurf amplifiers (draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-01.txt)

Le 2013-01-14 20:13, Fernando Gont a écrit : No. The following text in Section 4.2 of RFC 2460 overrides what's in RFC 4443: An earlier RFC can't "override" a later RFC. The later RFC wins. FWIW, all implementations I've tested so far behave as specified in RFC 2460, and hence can be leverage

Re: IPv6 smurf amplifiers (draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-01.txt)

Hi, Ole, On 01/14/2013 05:10 AM, Ole Troan wrote: >> We have published a revision of our I-D entitled "Security Implications >> of IPv6 options of Type 10xx", about IPv6 smurf amplifiers. >> >> The I-D is available at: >>

Re: IPv6 smurf amplifiers (draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-01.txt)

Fernando, et al, > We have published a revision of our I-D entitled "Security Implications > of IPv6 options of Type 10xx", about IPv6 smurf amplifiers. > > The I-D is available at: > . > > Any comments will be

IPv6 smurf amplifiers (draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-01.txt)

Folks, We have published a revision of our I-D entitled "Security Implications of IPv6 options of Type 10xx", about IPv6 smurf amplifiers. The I-D is available at: . Any comments will be very appreciated. Thank