Hello,
On August 23, 2004 I announced to this distribution a -00 document entitled:
"IPvLX: IPv6 Addressing in the IPv4 Internet"
Since that time, a -01 revision of the base document has obsoleted the
-00 version, and a new document entitled: "IPvLX Errata" that spe
Greg,
Thanks for the message. To clarify, however, IPvLX
*does not* propose to replace IPv6.
The IPvLX proposal incorporates IPv6 mechanisms as
core architectural elements.
Regards - Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Greg Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> (to t
Hi Fred,
(to the IPv6 wg only)
It may be worth mentioning, before you get a huge amount
of IPv6-WG ire flamed down upon you that the IPVLX BoF
was discussing some related ideas at the past IETF 60.
It was not in all proposals that IPv4 were being used
as transport, nor were the v4/v6 implications
Hello,
With Nokia hat off, I would like to announce a proposal for IPng
called: "IPvLX - IP with virtual Link eXtension". See:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-templin-ipvlx-00.txt
IPvLX uses IPv4 as an L2 protocol for network traversal and IPv6
as an L3 addressing protocol.
