On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:07:17AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That is only my trivial suggestion of redefinition semantics for 0xF.
> After all, 0xF has been a valid value of flow label. Originally, I just
> think only 20-bits is enough.
The TC does not change flow label semantics
主题：RE: Issue about
RFC3595 - Textual Conventions for
IPv6 Flow Label
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:49:27AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> RFC 3595 - Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label refers to:
> "IPv6FlowLabelOrAny ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
>DISPLAY-HINT "d"
>STATUS current
>DESCRIPTION "The flow identifier or Flow Label in an
RFC 3595 - Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label refers to:
"IPv6FlowLabelOrAny ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "d"
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The flow identifier or Flow Label in an IPv6
packet header that may be used to discriminate
