issues on the draft.
Hesham
> -Original Message-
> From: Basavaraj Patil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:51 AM
> To: ext JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 ; Soliman, Hesham
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; Thomas Narten
> Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Neighb
; Thomas Narten
> Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
> (IPv6)' to Draft Standard (draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis)
>
>
> Hesham,
>
> I like Jinmei's proposal of rejecting the issue as far as
> changing 2461bis
> value goes. Be
Hesham,
I like Jinmei's proposal of rejecting the issue as far as changing 2461bis
value goes. Because even the Max value of 2999 seconds is still not good
enough for some links.
So I think it is best to let IPv6 over foo specific documents specify what
router configuration variables are modifie
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:54:49 -0700,
> "Soliman, Hesham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This issue was discussed some time ago and we didn't officially resolve
> it on the list.
> Basavaraj is suggesting that the hard limit of 1800 seconds is
> restrictive to some deployments (cellular) an
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Soliman, Hesham wrote:
> MaxRtrAdvInterval
> The maximum time allowed between sending
> unsolicited multicast Router Advertisements from
> the interface, in seconds. MUST be no less than 4
> se
I have no problem with 1).
Hesham
> -Original Message-
> From: Basavaraj Patil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 4:24 AM
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Cc: Syam Madanapalli; Soliman, Hesham; Thomas Narten
> Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Neighbor
The IESG has received a request from the IP Version 6 Working Group
to consider the following document:
- 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) '
as a Draft Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send any co
