Re: M & O bit discussion today (Requirement 3)

2005-08-03 Thread Perry Lorier
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 2-aug-2005, at 17:15, Soohong Daniel Park wrote: > >> 2) Other requirements to be considered ? > > As someone who gets called when the day-to-day admins can't figure it > out, I feel it's important that all of this is as predictable as > possible. That means tha

Re: M & O bit discussion today (Requirement 3)

2005-08-03 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 2-aug-2005, at 17:15, Soohong Daniel Park wrote: 2) Other requirements to be considered ? As someone who gets called when the day-to-day admins can't figure it out, I feel it's important that all of this is as predictable as possible. That means that I want to know whether hosts are goi

Re: M & O bit discussion today (Requirement 3)

2005-08-02 Thread Soohong Daniel Park
As I pointed out, all requirement doesn't have any explicit conclusion, rather just refering them to make more shape requirement. Several guys from IPv6 meeting room (and mailing list) are saying that we don't need to care about Requirement 3. Also, Requirement 1 is at least acceptable and Require