Hi.
If I understand what you are asking correctly, I think you have misread
RFC 2675/2460. The jumbogram option lives in the hop-by-by-hop
extension header (Header Type (Next header value) 0, option type code C2
hex). The routing header is a a different extension header (Header Type
43). J
Hi Bert,
Thanks for pointing this out. I could not find any reference to the
RH0 header either.
Thanks again,
Vishwas
On Dec 4, 2007 2:47 AM, Manfredi, Albert E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps this was covered in the RH0 deprecation discussions and I missed
> it. How will jumbograms be code
: Manfredi, Albert E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 3/12/2007 4:17 PM
To: IETF IPv6 Mailing List
Subject: Question on IPv6 jumbograms
Perhaps this was covered in the RH0 deprecation discussions and I missed
it. How will jumbograms be coded in the IPv6 header if RH0 is rejected,
at some point
Perhaps this was covered in the RH0 deprecation discussions and I missed
it. How will jumbograms be coded in the IPv6 header if RH0 is rejected,
at some point? Since both a length of 0 bytes and RH0 are expected in
the IPv6 header, to indicate jumbogram (RFC 2675).
Bert
--
