[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:20 AM
> To: Dave Thaler; Soliman, Hesham; Bob Hinden
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
>
> It seems to me that it would be easier to obsolete RFC 4311 rather
than
> trying to keep it and 2461
Hesham, Dave,
A draft standard can't have a normative reference to a proposed
standard.
I believe the options are:
a) remove the problematic text from 2461bis and don't replace it with
anything (i.e., be silent on the issue). I'm not sure what the state
of 4311 changes to then, since it's upda
be
the simplest solution in the long run?
Bert
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Thaler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:04 PM
> To: Soliman, Hesham; Bob Hinden
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
>
>
Yes I was suggesting (b) above.
Hesham
>
> -Dave
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:22 AM
> > To: Bob Hinden
> > Cc: Dave Thaler; ipv6@ietf.org
> > Subject:
ob Hinden
> Cc: Dave Thaler; ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> > > Dave,
> > >
> > > I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone
> > > oppose Dave's suggestion
> > > below to
Hi Bob,
> > Dave,
> >
> > I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone
> > oppose Dave's suggestion
> > below to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ?
>
> Before answering the question, what would the exact change be to
> draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt?
=> So
Hesham,
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:48 AM, ext Soliman, Hesham wrote:
Dave,
I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone
oppose Dave's suggestion
below to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ?
Before answering the question, what would the exact change be to
draft-iet
Title: 2461bis and host-load-sharing
Dave,
I
think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone oppose Dave's
suggestion
below
to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ?
Thx,
Hesham
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Beh