Re: Elevation to Full Standard

2005-08-03 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: I think the node requirements document needs to be advanced as well before we should move the base specs to Full Standard as one cannot easily figure out what she/he should do to be IPv6 compliant. e.g. If I implement just RFC2460 and not RFC2461

Re: Elevation to Full Standard

2005-08-03 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi Folks, I think the node requirements document needs to be advanced as well before we should move the base specs to Full Standard as one cannot easily figure out what she/he should do to be IPv6 compliant. e.g. If I implement just RFC2460 and not RFC2461 and RFC2462

RE: Elevation to Full Standard

2005-08-03 Thread john . loughney
The Node Requirements is informative, so it doesn't advance. However, the document should be reved as appropriate to handle the issues you mention. John > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > ext Suresh Krishnan > Sent: 03 August, 2005 13:34

Re: Elevation to Full Standard

2005-08-03 Thread Bob Hinden
Hi Folks, I think the node requirements document needs to be advanced as well before we should move the base specs to Full Standard as one cannot easily figure out what she/he should do to be IPv6 compliant. e.g. If I implement just RFC2460 and not RFC2461 and RFC2462 am I still compliant?

Re: Elevation to Full Standard

2005-08-03 Thread Brian Haberman
Hi Suresh, On Aug 3, 2005, at 6:33, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi Folks, I think the node requirements document needs to be advanced as well before we should move the base specs to Full Standard as one cannot easily figure out what she/he should do to be IPv6 compliant. e.g. If I implement jus