RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-01.txt

2012-11-05 Thread Hemant Singh (shemant)
ginal Message- From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hin...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 10:25 PM To: Hemant Singh (shemant) Cc: Bob Hinden; Ole Trøan; Wes Beebee (wbeebee) Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-01.txt Hemant, Thanks for the update. Bob On Sep 21, 2012, at 6:

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-01.txt

2012-09-09 Thread Ray Hunter
Humbly suggest you read Section 4.3 one more time to double check that the text reflects what you mean. I never claimed the two interfaces would have the same address. Say Interface 2 is a stable interface. Interface 1 generates a new temporary address and performs DAD on it. The node remember

RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-01.txt

2012-09-09 Thread Hemant Singh (shemant)
Ray, Please see responses below for the use cases you raised. -Original Message- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ray Hunter Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 7:18 AM To: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-...@tools.ietf.org Cc: 6man Mailing List Subject: I-

RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-01.txt

2012-09-08 Thread Hemant Singh (shemant)
Ray, Appreciate the review. I will send another email to reply to your questions related to use cases. Other questions have been addressed below. -Original Message- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ray Hunter Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 7: