@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01
Hosnieh,
On 02/02/2013 06:41 PM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
>
>> CGA were not designed to address privacy related attacks, they are a
>> means
> of securing NDP exchanges. The fact that they appear random is
> coinc
Hosnieh,
On 02/02/2013 06:41 PM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
>
>> CGA were not designed to address privacy related attacks, they are a means
> of securing NDP exchanges. The fact that they appear random is coincidental
> to their function.
>
> It is true that the main purpose was security, but it is n
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 16:35 -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
> >> In the Abstract: I don't think the word "organitionally" exists.
> Administratively?
The word is unnecessary anyway. Just leave it out.
Regards, K.
--
~~~
Karl Auer
l Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karl
Auer
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 1:03 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01
>In the Abstract: I don&#
On 02/02/2013 21:41, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. Please find my responses inline.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karl
> Auer
...
>> In your description of how an EUI-64 IID is formed, you have omitted
Thanks for your comments. Please find my responses inline.
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karl
Auer
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 1:03 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01
> h
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 09:44 +0100, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
> Anyone had an opportunity to view the new version of our SSAS draft RFC. I
> received no comments after I applied the last comments given by Ray, Jeremy,
> Fernando and others. Your thoughts and comments would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
