Re: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-18 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: > => Linux is not conform too but the issue is more about REUSEADDR semantic. I beleive it IS. Tell me if you find anything it is not conforming to. => there were many messages about REUSEADDR & IPv4 vs IPv6 in the mailing list some years ago, including so

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-16 Thread itojun
> >In linux it works fine though, I only nead one socket. I have not > > tested any other O.S. yet. This seams highly contraditory... > > > > => Linux is not conform too but the issue is more about REUSEADDR semantic. > > One thing which works on every recent implementation is to set the IPv

RE: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-14 Thread Naidu, Venkata
-> > Hello IPv6: -> > -> > In RFC 3493 it is said AF_INET6 sockets receive -> connections from IPv4 nodes, -> > mapping their addresses to :::. I think -> this behaviour is -> > on by default. Although it is not explicitly stated, -> section 5.3 indicates a -> > way to turn off this behavi

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-14 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:52:34 +0200), Francis Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: >In linux it works fine though, I only nead one socket. I have not > tested any other O.S. yet. This seams highly contraditory... > > => Linux is not conform too but the issue is m

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-14 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: In RFC 3493 it is said AF_INET6 sockets receive connections from IPv4 nodes, mapping their addresses to :::. I think this behaviour is on by default. => you are right. Although it is not explicitly stated, section 5.3 indicates a way to turn off t

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-14 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:34:58 +0200), Stig Venaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > the behavior (relationship between AF_INET and AF_INET6 sockets/binds) > > is not documented, so there's no standard. sigh. > > I second that. I would hope that also Linux allo

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-14 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 11:34:58AM +0200, Stig Venaas wrote: > I second that. I would hope that also Linux allows you to bind both > AF_INET6 and AF_INET when using IPV6_V6ONLY socket option; I think that > would be reasonable and logical behaviour. I don't know if that is the > case though. It is

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-14 Thread Stig Venaas
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 04:05:04PM +0900, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > > Hello IPv6: > > > > In RFC 3493 it is said AF_INET6 sockets receive connections from IPv4 nodes, > > mapping their addresses to :::. I think this behaviour is > > on by default. Although it is not explicitly stated,

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses issue

2004-06-14 Thread Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
> Hello IPv6: > > In RFC 3493 it is said AF_INET6 sockets receive connections from IPv4 nodes, > mapping their addresses to :::. I think this behaviour is > on by default. Although it is not explicitly stated, section 5.3 indicates a > way to turn off this behaviour using the IPv6_V6ONLY sock