Brian,
Sounds good to me.
Bert
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 2:15 AM
> To: Manfredi, Albert E
> Cc: IPv6
> Subject: Re: NSAP Address IPv6 option (request to WG chairs)
>
> Bert,
>
On Jul 28, 2005, at 3:15, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Bert,
Over in another part of the universe, there's been quite a
discussion about the prudence required in the management
of limited namespaces, including IP options. As a result, I
don't want to leave what is basically garbage in the IANA
reg
7, 2005 4:56 AM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: IPv6; Bob Hinden
Subject: Re: NSAP Address IPv6 option
I haven't seen any more discussion on this.
It makes perfect sense to post errata, and as document
editor I can do that, but we also need to send a request to
IANA, as Bob suggested, and that pres
inal Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:56 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: IPv6; Bob Hinden
> Subject: Re: NSAP Address IPv6 option
>
> I haven't seen any more discussion on this.
>
> It makes perfect
red L wrote:
Why not just post this as errata to RFC4048?
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hinden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:18 AM
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: IPv6
Subject: Re: NSAP Address IPv6 option
Brian,
At 07:04 AM 07/11/2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Why not just post this as errata to RFC4048?
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hinden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:18 AM
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: IPv6
Subject: Re: NSAP Address IPv6 option
Brian,
At 07:04 AM 07/11/2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>RFC 1
Brian,
At 07:04 AM 07/11/2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
RFC 1888 defined a destination option called "NSAP Address"
with option type code 11-0-00011 = 195 decimal, C3 hexadecimal.
Unfortunately, the IANA Considerations in RFC 4048
faild to discuss this option. It is still listed at
http://www.i
