On 16-apr-04, at 8:22, Markus Jork wrote:
If there is an implementation choice to use or not use the NS/NA
mechanism on PPP interfaces, that sounds like a recipe for
interoperability problems to me.
That's not good.
Is there any plan to address this in the upcoming PPP spec
revision (and how)? Or
>
> However, there is one other thing you should consider. In IPv6, we're
> supposed to use /64s for pretty much all subnets. So it's not
> inconceivable that router A sends a packet to one of those 2^64
> addresses belonging to the PPP subnet that _isn't_ an address for
> router B. A naive im
On 15-apr-04, at 9:17, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai wrote:
I am looking for “Router to Router” connected by PPP links (POS)
running
IPV6CP.
Since ND is a union of (ARP, ICMP Rotuer Discovery, ICMP Redirect and
others), which part of ND is needed (or has to be implemented) in both
Routers.
Th
(BThanks in advance,
(BSubu
(B
(B-Original Message-
(BFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:26 PM
(BTo: Soliman Hesham
(BCc: Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSubject: Re: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery
(B
(B
(B
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:17:18 -0400,
> "Soliman Hesham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> From router point of view, global address can be get from
>> Configuration. So
>> I am still thinking, for router case do we need ND?
> => Do you think hosts connected to your router
> will need the i
nks in advance
> Subu
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Soliman Hesham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 11:57 AM
> To: Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery
>
>
>
nia Pillai - CTD, Chennai; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery
> I am running IPV6CP for PPP links. I will come to know the link local
> address from IPV6CP itself. I can also derive (global eui-64
> based) global
> unicast address based on IPV6CP identi
> I am running IPV6CP for PPP links. I will come to know the link local
> address from IPV6CP itself. I can also derive (global eui-64
> based) global
> unicast address based on IPV6CP identifier.
>
> My doubt is "Should I run ND on PPP links in addition?" Can
> any one please
> tell m
