> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>I know this is too late but why wern't the changes from the
> > thread
> >>http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg01689.html
> >>incorporated?
> >
> > Looks like I missed that during AUTH48. Want to file an erratta
>
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is too late but why wern't the changes from the
thread
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg01689.html
incorporated?
Looks like I missed that during AUTH48. Want to file an erratta
about it? M
> I know this is too late but why wern't the changes from the
thread
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg01689.html
> incorporated?
Looks like I missed that during AUTH48. Want to file an erratta about
it?
My guess is that at some point, we'll need to make a
I know this is too late but why wern't the changes from the thread
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg01689.html
incorporated?
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742
