Re: RFC2461bis: Semantics of "advertising interface"

2004-08-07 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:58:38 -0700 (PDT), > Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > Major issue: RFC 2461 actually says that in 6.2.2: >> > - enabling IP forwarding capability (i.e., changing the system >> > from being a host to being a router), when the interface's >

RE: RFC2461bis: Semantics of "advertising interface"

2004-07-29 Thread Soliman Hesham
(B > It seems like in 2461bis-00.txt that the introduction of IsRouter in (B > 6.2.1 is inconsistent with the text in 6.2.2 about (B > AdvSendAdvertisements. (B > (B > RFC 2461 reads as if a node "advertises" itself as a router (B > (by sending RAs (B > and setting the R-flag in NAs any

Re: RFC2461bis: Semantics of "advertising interface"

2004-07-28 Thread Erik Nordmark
> > Major issue: RFC 2461 actually says that in 6.2.2: > > - enabling IP forwarding capability (i.e., changing the system > > from being a host to being a router), when the interface's > > AdvSendAdvertisements flag is TRUE. > > > This is not how I recall the intent when we w

Re: RFC2461bis: Semantics of "advertising interface"

2004-07-15 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
(Catching up some old messages...sorry for the delayed response.) > On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:52:23 -0700 (PDT), > Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > [New subject since this is a separate issue. How do we get an issue > number allocated?] As far as I know, only the main editor (as w