RE: Sending ICMP error upon receiving an NA without SLLAO in 2461bis

2006-01-16 Thread Soliman, Hesham
Folks, There were only two new emails on this subject. Given the overwhelming lack of interest in this issue and that both responders felt that it was ok to keep things as is (without adding ICMP errors), this issue is now closed and the suggestion in my email below is rejected. Therefore, the

Re: Sending ICMP error upon receiving an NA without SLLAO in 2461bis

2006-01-10 Thread Derek Smalls
According to RFC 2492 SLLAO option should not be used in an ATM PVC environment, yet the NA may be transmitted as a part of DAD which is still required. Thus with this proposal we can have an ICMP error generated in a scenario where no error condition has occurred. --- Thomas Narten wrote: > > T

Re: Sending ICMP error upon receiving an NA without SLLAO in 2461bis

2006-01-10 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:59:46 -0500, > Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> The basic issue left is whether we should allow a node to send an ICMP error >> due to the reception of an NA without the SLLAO. The reason for sending the >> ICMP error is to inform upper layers that the

RE: Sending ICMP error upon receiving an NA without SLLAO in 2461bis

2006-01-09 Thread Soliman, Hesham
> > The basic issue left is whether we should allow a node to > send an ICMP error > > due to the reception of an NA without the SLLAO. The > reason for sending the > > ICMP error is to inform upper layers that the communication has > > failed. > > It took me a while to figure out wha

Re: Sending ICMP error upon receiving an NA without SLLAO in 2461bis

2006-01-09 Thread Thomas Narten
> The basic issue left is whether we should allow a node to send an ICMP error > due to the reception of an NA without the SLLAO. The reason for sending the > ICMP error is to inform upper layers that the communication has > failed. It took me a while to figure out what you are proposing. To summ