Hi Samita,
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Samita Chakrabarti
wrote:
[snip]
>
> SC==> I understand your concern. Given that this is an IETF generic
> document, it makes sense to remove the cellular/LTE reference from this
> document. Will do that in the next revision.
>
> Also I agree w
Hi Jouni,
Please see in-line below.
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 2:29 PM
To: Samita Chakrabarti
Cc: 6man Mailing List; Bob Hinden; Ole Trøan; Erik Nordmark; Fredrik Garneij
Subject: Re: Updated Efficient-nd
Hi Samita,
sorry for delay.. my emails have been a bit in limbo.
On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:13 PM, Samita Chakrabarti
wrote:
[snip]
(I'll just skip this part for the time being..)
>>> Thanks. I am just trying to get my head around this. Current statements for
>>> usability in cellular just se
On 11/27/12 11:41 PM, Jouni wrote:
Ok. Thanks for pointing the optionality. Missed that. If the registration is
optional, then what is the benefit? My point is that trying to optimize ND over
3GPP link any further is likely a wasted effort. As of today, there is no DAD
or address resolution,
Hi Jouni,
I understand this is not the forum to discuss 3GPP modifications.
The information in the draft is based on information from multiple sources who
believe that 3GPP IPv6 equipments(routers) often support DAD and periodic
router advertisements for ND implementations.
Please take a loo
> Cc: 6man Mailing List; Bob Hinden; Ole Trøan; Erik Nordmark
> Subject: Re: Updated Efficient-nd posted
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a quick glance over the I-D. Since you are referring to LTE networks (I
> assume this is the indirect assumption for cellular networks in the I-D).
&
Hi Jouni,
Please the response in-line.
-Original Message-
From: jouni korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 6:54 AM
To: Samita Chakrabarti
Cc: 6man Mailing List; Bob Hinden; Ole Trøan; Erik Nordmark
Subject: Re: Updated Efficient-nd posted
Hi,
I
Hi,
I had a quick glance over the I-D. Since you are referring to LTE networks (I
assume this is the indirect assumption for cellular networks in the I-D). I
wonder what kind of real & specific benefits you envision over, say the LTE
link? Those cellular links are already rather quiescent when
