At Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:07:52 +0200 (EET),
Pekka Savola wrote:
> > I'm afraid "has not been implemented" is too strong. In fact, we have
> > "implemented" it in the KAME/BSD IPv6 stack in that we implemented
> > special restrictions (at that time) on anycast addresses and had
> > experimentally a
Message-
> From: Fred Baker [mailto:f...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:54 AM
> To: Miya Kohno
> Cc: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉; Becca Nitzan; ra...@psg.com;
> m...@iij.ad.jp; ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: comments on draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.tx
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, JINMEI Tatuya / wrote:
I'm afraid "has not been implemented" is too strong. In fact, we have
"implemented" it in the KAME/BSD IPv6 stack in that we implemented
special restrictions (at that time) on anycast addresses and had
experimentally assigned subnet-router anycast
A note you may find interesting in this context is:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5375.txt
5375 IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations. G. Van de Velde,
C. Popoviciu, T. Chown, O. Bonness, C. Hahn. December 2008.
(Format:
TXT=83809 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)
You already rev
Thank you, Tatsuya, for your thorough review.
I think both of your points are apposite. We'll reflect them into the -01
version.
Thanks again,
Miya
> -Original Message-
> From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:jin...@isc.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:37 PM
> To: Miya Kohno; Bec
