RE: draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option

2010-03-09 Thread Wojciech Dec (wdec)
: draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option Hi, I would believe this requires also discussion in MIF WG, right? Thanks, Teemu From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Wojciech

RE: draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option

2010-03-09 Thread Wojciech Dec (wdec)
Replying based on my understanding > -Original Message- > From: Eliot Lear [mailto:l...@cisco.com] > Sent: 05 March 2010 08:02 > To: Wojciech Dec (wdec) > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: Re: draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option > > > Woj, > > Three questions

RE: draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option

2010-03-09 Thread teemu.savolainen
Hi, I would believe this requires also discussion in MIF WG, right? Thanks, Teemu From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Wojciech Dec (wdec) Sent: 05. maaliskuuta 2010 08:55 To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option Hi Folks, About 1 year

Re: draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option

2010-03-04 Thread Eliot Lear
Woj, Three questions for the group: 1. Is there a practical limit to the number of route entries? 2. Is there a practical need to pad in DHCP? 3. Would it be better to provide a seed address into some sort of routing function so that the information can change without having to monkey with