Yes, thanks !
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Hui [mailto:jon...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:58 AM
To: Reddy, Joseph
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option questions
Hi Joseph,
It is not actually required to use tunneling if the RPL router
unnelllig to include the RPL Option.
>
>
> -Regards, Joseph
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:03:01 -0800
> From: Jonathan Hui
> To: Richard Kelsey
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option
ds, Joseph
--
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:03:01 -0800
From: Jonathan Hui
To: Richard Kelsey
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option questions
Message-ID: <50a9f9c5-8c71-4f5e-b084-a127b7e98...@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Ric
Hi Richard,
On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:14 AM, Richard Kelsey wrote:
> In section 4, "Router Behavior" draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option
> says:
>
> Routers MUST use IPv6-in-IPv6 tunneling, as specified in
> [RFC2473] to include a new RPL Option in datagrams that
> are sourced by other nodes.
>
> Wha
