formation option is just trying to provide more
information for each prefix in RA, these information will and can help
host/terminal select correct prefix/source address/exit router in
multihoming environment. It doesn't damage exiting address selection
rule. It seems exiting rule ha
ndered what
kind of the changes will be made.
Kindest regards,
Arifumi Matusmoto
Best regards,
Haibo
-Original Message-
From: Arifumi Matsumoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2006年6月9日 19:12
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: questions about draft-wen-ipv6-rsra-opt-multihoming-00
Hi
he the information with the related prefix (/address), these
information will help it select correct source address and so on.
Best regards,
Haibo
> -Original Message-
> From: Arifumi Matsumoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2006年6月9日 19:12
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject
Hi Wen,
Maybe, we are working on similar problems.
Let me comment on a few things about your proposal.
- I think Routing Header is an interesting method
to implement policy routing at gateway. The problem
is which router has to support Routing Header.
Is it correct that L3 CPE and also ISP's
Title: RE: questions about draft-wen-ipv6-rsra-opt-multihoming-00
Thomas,
Thanks for your comments.
I'll explain this for you.
(1)"the scenario is rather limited, a single link directly connected to
multiple ISPs (through different routers). IMO, this is too
ssage-
> From: Greg Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2006年6月7日 20:48
> To: CTO WEN Haibo
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: questions about
> draft-wen-ipv6-rsra-opt-multihoming-00
>
>
>
> Hi Wen,
>
>
> > 802.21 is developing standards t
;To: ipv6@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: questions about draft-wen-ipv6-rsra-opt-multihoming-00
>
>
>FWIW, based on my skimming of the document, I think this is a
>bad approach. Reasons:
>
>1) the scenario is rather limited, a single link directly connected to
> multiple
FWIW, based on my skimming of the document, I think this is a bad
approach. Reasons:
1) the scenario is rather limited, a single link directly connected to
multiple ISPs (through different routers). IMO, this is too
limiting a scenario to develop a specifiic solution that doesn't
address
Hi Wen,
> 802.21 is developing standards to enable handover and
> interoperability between heterogeneous network types including both
> 802 and non 802 networks. 802.21 is running below IP layer.
> However, SAAC procedure is running in IP layer.
802.21 is designed to run over L3/L4 transpor
