RE: RFC 3041/4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6"

2009-06-17 Thread Dunn, Jeffrey H.
) -Original Message- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 6:13 PM To: Prakasha Shetty Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: RFC 3041/4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6" Hi Praka

Re: RFC 3041/4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6"

2009-06-16 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Prakash, The privacy addresses are no different than any other unicast addresses. The only impact may be on routers performing ingress filtering as described in section 7 of RFC4941. Cheers Suresh On 09-06-12 08:36 AM, Prakasha Shetty wrote: Hi, By having this feature of generating tem

Re: RFC 3041/4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6"

2009-06-12 Thread RĂ©mi Denis-Courmont
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:06:07 +0530, Prakasha Shetty wrote: > By having this feature of generating temporary address and make that > address for new client connections, which are all features/tools (ex : > tcpdump, router tools etc ) are affected and in what manner ? That is a matter of implement

RFC 3041/4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6"

2009-06-12 Thread Prakasha Shetty
Hi, By having this feature of generating temporary address and make that address for new client connections, which are all features/tools (ex : tcpdump, router tools etc ) are affected and in what manner ? Thanks & Regards Prakash --