Re: RFC 4861: Multicast Router Advertisement

2010-12-29 Thread Karl Auer
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 19:30 +0100, Juan A. Ternero wrote: > Dear members: > I agree with Karl that one end of the time interval is when the router sent > its > most recent Router Advertisement, and that interval must be less than > MIN_DELAY_BETWEEN_RAS. > > My question was about the other end

Re: RFC 4861: Multicast Router Advertisement

2010-12-29 Thread Juan A. Ternero
Dear members: I agree with Karl that one end of the time interval is when the router sent its most recent Router Advertisement, and that interval must be less than MIN_DELAY_BETWEEN_RAS. My question was about the other end of the interval. Is it the computed value in the first paragraph (a ran

Re: RFC 4861: Multicast Router Advertisement

2010-12-16 Thread Karl Auer
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 20:34 +0100, Juan A. Ternero wrote: > - If the router sent a multicast Router Advertisement (solicited or > unsolicited) within the last MIN_DELAY_BETWEEN_RAS seconds, ...” > > The question is about the second paragraph: “within the last ...” > > When does the time start? Do

RFC 4861: Multicast Router Advertisement

2010-12-16 Thread Juan A. Ternero
Dear members: I have a question about the Router Advertisement sending algorithm of RFC 4861. On page 49, it states: “A router might process Router Solicitations as follows: - Upon receipt of a Router Solicitation, compute a random delay within the range 0 through MAX_RA_DELAY_TIME. If the comp