Thank you, all.
Tom, I'll compile those changes in the next revision.
Chairs,
can this item go to the next step after including above changes ?
2012/11/27 t.petch
> Hi
>
> If I did comment, my comments have not been actioned so I probably did
> not comment:-)
>
> In Abstract, suggest
> /allow
Hi
If I did comment, my comments have not been actioned so I probably did
not comment:-)
In Abstract, suggest
/allow nodes to select appropriate address/allow nodes to select an
appropriate address/
and s.2
/POLICY TABLE OPITONS/POLICY TABLE OPTIONS/
I think that that is all I had but will chec
Confirmed.
Apologies for the long RTT as I've been off-net.
regards,
RayH
Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
> All,
>
> I have not received any comments on this revision.
> Please confirm that this revision reflects the concerns you raised
> during the WGLC.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> 2012/11/14 mailto:internet-dr
I'm happy with the changes; they fix my concerns.
Regards
Brian
On 27/11/2012 05:05, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
> All,
>
> I have not received any comments on this revision.
> Please confirm that this revision reflects the concerns you raised during
> the WGLC.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> 2012/11/14
All,
I have not received any comments on this revision.
Please confirm that this revision reflects the concerns you raised during
the WGLC.
Thanks.
2012/11/14
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Mainten