Bob,
I agree that there is consensus to move this forward as PS. There
will be an IETF Last Call for the draft as a PS started after Vancouver.
Regards,
Brian
On 7/26/12 7:47 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
Brian,
In the two plus weeks since you sent this, I saw one email in support
and none is
Brian,
In the two plus weeks since you sent this, I saw one email in support and none
is opposition. Given the lack of objections to publishing this as a Proposed
Standard, I think OK to go forward as a PS.
Bob
On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
> During the IESG di
.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Haberman"
To: "6man WG" ; "6man Chairs"
<6man-cha...@tools.ietf.org>; "Barry Leiba" ;
"Pete Resnick" ; "Ralph Droms"
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:36 AM
Subject: Status of dra
All,
During the IESG discussion of draft-ietf-6man-lineid, the question
was raised as to its appropriate status. The WG decided to advance the
draft as Experimental since it had documented limitations and was
targeted to a limited deployment scenario. Several ADs raised the issue
that t
