On 29/05/2013 11:57, Michael Sweet wrote:
> Brian,
>
> On 2013-05-28, at 4:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter
> wrote:
>> I'm increasingly baffled by the use case. If the host is
>> in a context where it can reach a server *and* has more than
>> one interface (such that a ZoneID is needed at all), it
>> s
On 29 May 2013, at 00:57, Michael Sweet wrote:
> Brian,
>
> On 2013-05-28, at 4:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter
> wrote:
>> I'm increasingly baffled by the use case. If the host is
>> in a context where it can reach a server *and* has more than
>> one interface (such that a ZoneID is needed at all),
Brian,
On 2013-05-28, at 4:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter
wrote:
> I'm increasingly baffled by the use case. If the host is
> in a context where it can reach a server *and* has more than
> one interface (such that a ZoneID is needed at all), it
> shouldn't be using a link local address anyway - it
> s
I'm increasingly baffled by the use case. If the host is
in a context where it can reach a server *and* has more than
one interface (such that a ZoneID is needed at all), it
shouldn't be using a link local address anyway - it
should have configured a global scope address (possibly
under a ULA prefi
