On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:21:10PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> Very late to this party, but:
>
> On 27-Jun-2007, at 09:11, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> >We can argue about the meaning of "intrinsically" I guess. But what
> >I mean
> >is that they are /48s and I don't expect to see /48s routed glo
On 2007-07-02 00:21, Joe Abley wrote:
Very late to this party, but:
On 27-Jun-2007, at 09:11, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
We can argue about the meaning of "intrinsically" I guess. But what I
mean
is that they are /48s and I don't expect to see /48s routed globally.
Architecturally, they are cer
Very late to this party, but:
On 27-Jun-2007, at 09:11, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
We can argue about the meaning of "intrinsically" I guess. But what
I mean
is that they are /48s and I don't expect to see /48s routed globally.
Architecturally, they are certainly routeable (and so are /128s).
B
On 2007-06-27 20:38, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Templin, Fred L wrote:
I thought the ULA-C registry was supposed to be something
very simple like a robot.
yes but that's before we all started to consider what troubles we could
get into by opening up ULA-C...
I think that's
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Templin, Fred L wrote:
I thought the ULA-C registry was supposed to be something
very simple like a robot.
yes but that's before we all started to consider what troubles we could
get into by opening up ULA-C...
--
--
Roger Jorgensen
Leo Vegoda wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2007, at 1:03pm, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Most childhood illnesses go away but the /48 assignments made by ARIN
>>> and APNIC are permanent. What incentive is there - or will there be -
>>> for those organisations to return their prefixes and take PA spac
plin, Fred L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:19 PM
> > To: Jeroen Massar; Leo Vegoda
> > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; Brian E Carpenter; Pekka Savola
> > Subject: RE: ULA and WAN-routability
> >
> > > In effect one can indeed also use ULA
On 27 Jun 2007, at 1:03pm, Jeroen Massar wrote:
[...]
Most childhood illnesses go away but the /48 assignments made by ARIN
and APNIC are permanent. What incentive is there - or will there be -
for those organisations to return their prefixes and take PA space
from
one or more of their upstr
is not cost per IP address but cost per database entry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:19 PM
> To: Jeroen Massar; Leo Vegoda
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; Brian E Carpenter; Pekka Savola
> Subject: RE:
Leo Vegoda wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2007, at 10:52am, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the facts. It does seem like a childhood illness
>> though - obviously it isn't sustainable as IPv6 grows up.
>
> Most childhood illnesses go away but the /48 assignments made by ARIN
> and APNIC are permanen
> In effect one can indeed also use ULA-C kind of addresses as
> "Identifiers" as they are truly globally unique just like PI, but that
> is the whole point why ULA-C is futile: they _are_ just like PI ;)
> Except that they will be carved out of a special prefix and
> handled in a
> strange way. A
On 27 Jun 2007, at 10:52am, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Thanks for the facts. It does seem like a childhood illness
though - obviously it isn't sustainable as IPv6 grows up.
Most childhood illnesses go away but the /48 assignments made by ARIN
and APNIC are permanent. What incentive is there -
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Thanks for the facts. It does seem like a childhood illness
> though - obviously it isn't sustainable as IPv6 grows up.
It indeed most likely won't in the very long term.
But hopefully the id/loc mechanisms or shim6 or similar solutions will
make sure that the "IPv6 DFZ
Thanks for the facts. It does seem like a childhood illness
though - obviously it isn't sustainable as IPv6 grows up.
Brian
On 2007-06-27 16:06, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
[..]
We can argue about the meaning of "intrinsically" I guess. But what I mean
is that they are /4
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
[..]
> We can argue about the meaning of "intrinsically" I guess. But what I mean
> is that they are /48s and I don't expect to see /48s routed globally.
Quickly checking http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/, taking a rather long
raw-dump of it, cut&pasting it into a textfile a
On 2007-06-27 14:17, Pekka Savola wrote:
Catching up on email..
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
I see only downsides (unnecessary costs and useless policy discussions)
in treating this as anything but a purely technical matter. Let's leave
the policy discussions for matters wh
Catching up on email..
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
I see only downsides (unnecessary costs and useless policy discussions)
in treating this as anything but a purely technical matter. Let's leave
the policy discussions for matters where fairness and route scaling
are at stak
17 matches
Mail list logo
