SO would BREAK some of the IPv6 connectivities that are available
>> today !!!
>>
>> ==> This hack MUST therefore be flatly rejected.
>>
>>
>> If and when the mentioned OS problems are documented, it will be possible to
>> fix them with patches i
If and when the mentioned OS problems are documented, it will be possible
> to fix them with patches in OSes, where they belong.
>
> RD
>
>
>
> Le 30 mars 2010 à 00:21, Ed Jankiewicz a écrit :
>
> > Probably no one on either of the IPv6 lists attended the DNSOPS WG
> meeting
ong.
RD
Le 30 mars 2010 ? 00:21, Ed Jankiewicz a écrit :
Probably no one on either of the IPv6 lists attended the DNSOPS WG meeting in
Anaheim, since it was at the same time as 6man.
Presentation by Yahoo! of a proposal to "do an ugly hack on DNS" to work around an issue
with "
:
> Probably no one on either of the IPv6 lists attended the DNSOPS WG meeting in
> Anaheim, since it was at the same time as 6man.
>
> Presentation by Yahoo! of a proposal to "do an ugly hack on DNS" to work
> around an issue with "broken OSes" that send out