Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+

2004-03-17 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake "Mark Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > At a minimum, being present in the global DNS should be at the option > > of the allocatee. Until a viable solution is found for non-registered > > prefixes, this might be given as an advantage of using a registered prefix. > > Well non-registered

Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+

2004-03-17 Thread Mark Andrews
> Thus spake "Christian Huitema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In her review of "draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt", Margaret > > raises an excellent point: > > > > > (1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected > > > that whatever registry assigns these values will

Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+

2004-03-17 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake "Christian Huitema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In her review of "draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt", Margaret > raises an excellent point: > > > (1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected > > that whatever registry assigns these values will also populate

Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+

2004-03-17 Thread Ignatios Souvatzis
Hi Fred, > Also, what about other non-DNS naming services that can be deployed > within a site/organization? E.g., the Sun Yellow Pages (I guess it's called > NIS now?) We don't confess it in public, and we block all RPC requests at our border routers, but some of us do. > and the naming service

Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+

2004-03-15 Thread Fred Templin
Christian,   Christian Huitema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We generally shied away from the second solution, and generally fromusing the host identification query to provide reverse mappings.   Is "host identification query" == "Node Information Queries" here?   Also, what about other non-DNS naming

Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+

2004-03-14 Thread Pekka Savola
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Christian Huitema wrote: > We generally shied away from the second solution, and generally from > using the host identification query to provide reverse mappings. Using > LLMNR does make sense when LLMNR is also used as the primary name > resolution service within the unique-lo

Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+

2004-03-14 Thread Christian Huitema
In her review of "draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt", Margaret raises an excellent point: > (1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected that > whatever registry assigns these values will also populate the reverse > DNS tree? Or not? The registration pro