Re: draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses (was: Re: Meta comment about "3484bis and privacy addresses")

2012-03-27 Thread Jong-Hyouk Lee
Dear all I'm working on ETSI and ISO standardization for ITS (vehicular communication) where location privacy at the IPv6 layer is one of big concerns. From the viewpoint of IPv6 ITS communication, we definitely need to preserve location privacy. Accordingly, I strongly support the method describe

draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses (was: Re: Meta comment about "3484bis and privacy addresses")

2012-03-27 Thread Fernando Gont
On 03/27/2012 04:44 PM, Dominik Elsbroek wrote: > since I got confused on the discussion in the plenary this morning: I > think we have to consider that having a temporary address like defined > in RFC 4941 does not prevent from or even mitigates the scanning > problem mentioned this morning in dis